Už automobilių vagystes ketvirtadienį nuteisti penki Londone gyvenantys imigrantai iš Lietuvos kalėjime praleis bendroje sumoje 16 metų, skelbia „harlowherald.co.uk“. Organozuotos gaujos pavogtų lengvųjų automobilių vertė siekia 750 000 svarų. Vieno gaujos nario teismas vyksta šiandien.
Per Britanijos policijos surengtą operaciją „Nidus“ buvo išaiškinta, kad iš Londono Stanstedo oro uosto buvo pavogta mažiausiai 40 didelės vertės automobilių.
Nustatyta, kad 2009 m. balandžio mėn. Stanstedo oro uoste gaujos nariai išsinuomojo „Audi A4“, „Mercedes C180“ ir „Opel Astra“ markės automobilius ir jų negrąžino. Tyrimo metu policija tuos automobilius rado su perdarytais registracijos numeriais ir dokumentais.
Vagišiai įsilauždavo į namus ir, pavogę automobilių raktelius, nuvarydavo automobilius. Dažniausiai jų grobiu tapdavo BMW, „Mercedes“, „Audi“ ir aukštos klasės „Volkswagen“ markės automobiliai.
Niekur nedirbantys Krzystofas Nowickis (38 m.) ir Eduardas Masiulis (34 m.) pripažinti kaltais, kaip dalyvavę nusikalstamoje gaujos veikloje ir pardavinėję vogtus automobilius.
Bylos svarstymas truko du mėnesius. Gaujos nariui dailidei Joanui Bondarenko (35 m.), bedarbiams Vidmantui Lajauskui (28 m.) ir Nerijui Jaruševičiui (33 m.), statybininkui Kamiliui Dudko (23 m.) buvo paskelbtas kaltinamasis nuosprendis.
J.Bondarenko buvo nuteistas jam nedalyvaujant, o K.Dudko pasislėpė įpusėjus bylos svarstymui. Dabar policija bando nustatyti pradingusių vyriškių buvimo vietą.
Ketvirtadienį J.Bondarenko buvo pripažintas gaujos organizatoriumi ir nuteistas 7 metams laisvės atėmimo. V.Lajauskas ir N.Jaruševičius nuteisti 3,5 metų kalėjimo, K.Dudko – metams ir 10 mėnesių kalėjimo. K.Nowickis nuteistas 1 metams laisvės atėmimo bausme lygtinai. E.Masiulo bylos svarstymas vyksta šiandien, liepos 2 d.
Bylos tyrėjų teigimu, organizuotos gaujos nariai išsidavė, kai ėmė vogti automobilius iš oro uosto. JK visuose oro uostuose įrengta sudėtinga apsaugos ir stebėjimo sistema, kuri ir leido susekti plėšikų gaują. Tyrėjai tikisi, kad visi tie, kurie galimai nukentėjo nuo šios gaujos, kreipsis į policiją ir baudžiamasis persekiojimas bus pratęstas.
Komentarai
Galiu pasakyti tik tiek mazai prasukom,buvo galma daugiau :)
kaip JB visada sako "tegu vargsai dirba...":))), pasiilgau x
visai nera cia judesio jokio,ydomu kaip ten vyrukam sekasi? vieniems kaleime kitiems ant slidziu,tikiuosi ju taip ir neuzgaudys ta stora pydersha. kaip tau sekasi misteri su akinukais?
tegu vagia,ar gaila,kiekvienas gyvenam taip kaip mokam...veniem patink dirbt,kitiems vogt
nevaikiskai chia, shaunuoliai !!! , tik galejo neuzkliuti ...
man atrodo del taves JB ta storule mentersha perplauks lamanco sasiauri rankom kad tik tave surastu
Sveiki, taigi neseniai buvau Lietuvoje, viskas buvo gerai, bet paskutine diena (kai jau vaziavau i oro uosta) gavau bauda uz greicio virsijima.
Taigi klausimas kaip sumoketi ta bauda dabar, ar galima internetu is mano angliskos saskaitos (lloyds) ar reikia eiti i banka ir ten kazkaip pervest pinigus?
aciu uz patarimus
Bukit patenkinti ,kad paskaityti turit kas jums patinka!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ziauru kai zmogui pasiulai pinigu ir jis pasiruosias padaryti bent ka. kad juos gauti.£4000 i savaite ir tik sypsotis. Man atrodytu jus padarytumet belenka uz tuos pinigus.Bet kai jau bedoj tai tu jau nekaltas ir tave priverte tie pinigai tai padaryti.
Na taip tie pinigai!!!!!!!!!
agirdi tvariau, JB (vadinamas gaujos vade) visus draugus permetei pinigus pasiemes.
Cia jai kam bus idomu kaip jus durina :)
ir jai supranti......: :)
(And why you should NEVER feel sorry for Banks and so on)
(As simplified as I can make it, based on the work of Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Elizabeth: Croft and (to some extent Winston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst), and John R. Dempsey of Sovereign Trust. I've just tried to reduce it to absolute fundamentals)
1) Banks: They take deposits. These are held in trust for the depositor. They must, by law, always be prepared to return any and all deposits back to depositors on demand. That's the LAW. They would not be able to do that if they were ever to lend out any money on deposit to anyone requesting a loan. They cannot, therefore, lend or invest anything entrusted to them. So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you?
2) Loan Companies, Credit Card Companies, Building Societies: They don't take deposit money anyway (I'm talking about the 'older version' of Building Societies before they became banks. I'm referring to the way they would just issue mortgages. Their 'banking' activities are controlled as in (1), above). So the question is: Where do they get the money from, in order to loan it to you as a mortgage?
Leave that question pending for a moment.
3) What is a cheque? Paper, printing ink, somewhere you can hand-write a Payee, and Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature.
4) What is a Loan Application/Agreement? Paper, printing ink, somewhere a Payee will be written (the name of the Loan Company), somewhere for an Amount (in numbers and words), a Date, and somewhere to write your signature.
Do you see any similarity between (3) & (4)?
A Loan Agreement is a cheque. (Cheques can be written on anything ... even toilet paper ... provided it contains the essential information so as to enable correct clearance processing)
You send off the Loan Agreement to the Loan Company ... and they CASH YOUR CHEQUE! They cash it with an organisation that has the power to issue 'money' for that purpose (for example the Treasury, or the Bank of England, etc)
NOW THEY HAVE THE MONEY, IN CASH, TO LEND TO YOU!
Simple. Wasn't it?
But wait! Sure, they provided the 'service' of converting your cheque into funds within an account you can drawn upon (write other cheques against, use a Credit Card against, etc). And they could do that because they knew how to do that. And yes, that was a service. And yes, they should be paid a fee for that service.
But wait again! What is their 'fee'? Their 'servicing fee'?
Oh ... only THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF YOUR ORIGINAL CHEQUE, PLUS INTEREST!
That's all they ask for .. in order to provide the original service!
How to do they ensure they collect this 'service fee'. By giving you a Payment Book! And they make sure they cream off the INTEREST, before applying the remainder as PAYMENT. In fact they even cajole you into never-ending INTEREST by specifying a minimum payment equal to the INTEREST they want. (Knowing full well you'll often opt for that, thereby allowing them to roll the whole thing on endlessly)
Now let's view this another way.
If you write a cheque for £100, and send it to someone else (the Payee), and they cash it - DO YOU EXPECT THE BANK TO DEDUCT ANOTHER £100 PLUS INTEREST - FOR ITSELF - AS WELL?
No? You don't when you write a cheque you 'see' as a cheque do you?
Well, then, why should they do that just because you can't 'see' a Loan Agreement as the cheque it actually is?
MONEY IS CREATED WHEN YOU SIGN A PIECE OF PAPER AGREEING TO PAY.
AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY MONEY IS -EVER- CREATED.
Your 'promise to pay' creates money. Yours, and everyone else's.
So what -should- happen, then?
What should happen is that you write out a cheque - promising to pay - and send it to the Treasury yourself. They would then 'cash' it (in the same way they do that for a Bank), by updating an account with the amount you specified, from which you can draw funds as you need them.
That's it. Your 'promise to pay' stands until the end of time. That's all money is. A 'promise to pay', which stands until the end of time.
All money. "All thee bits of it".
Check out a Banknote. What does it say? "I promise to pay the Bearer on demand the sum of so-many-pounds". And signed by the Governor of the Bank of England (in the UK). A banknote is a Promissory Note - just like a cheque or Loan Agreement or any other IOU. An IOU that stands until the end of time.
What should a Bank do? It should simply accept the 'cash' from the Treasury, and operate the account for you.
And claim a reasonable - SMALL - fee for providing you with this convenience.
If you agree to some of your funds being invested, the bank should deduct their fees as commission, and not bother you with any other 'charges' at all.
THIS IS WHERE WE NEED TO GET TO. To be able to convert your SIGNATURE directly, without any Bank or Loan Company intervening.
And now for something completely different
When you sent them your cheque (aka Loan Agreement) and they cashed it, they could have just walked away with your money. If they'd done that, you wouldn't have known any difference.
They could have just written to you and said "Sorry, we didn't approve this loan, after all"
You would have been miffed at not getting the loan but, on the other hand, slightly relieved you didn't have the payments hanging over you, believing that the whole thing was 'dead'.
Dead? They were 'up' by the amount of the loan! And you were empty-handed! And you had given them that amount!
Dead? I should cocoa!
No. They are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. They want INTEREST. Never-ending INTEREST. They POSITIVELY HATE IT when you pay off a loan. Have you noticed? Try getting a loan, and then paying it back immediately. TRY IT.
No. They can lend you your own money, and then claim it back PLUS INTEREST, if they don't just walk away.
That's why they don't just walk away.
Every loan taken out generates money for them. Generated by your payments back.
That's where banks (etc.) get their money from. All they need to do is to make as sure as possible you've fallen for this SCAM sufficient times in the past, so as to be pretty sure you'll fall for it again.
If you 'default' on payments, they had ALREADY BEEN PAID IN FULL RIGHT AT THE START. They took the risk with it. Exactly the same risk as when they invest anywhere. If prices go down, they simply lose, write off the experience, and try elsewhere. Do they send bailiffs if 'prices go down'? Err ... no.
They 'involve' themselves when (as explained above) they have no need to be. The risks of doing so are, therefore, entirely theirs, and consequently there is absolutely no need to feel sorry for them.
YOU, on the other hand, don't owe ANYTHING to ANYONE.
What YOU did was to 'make some money' - and then spend it the way you wanted to spend it.
And why not? 'Money was made' by you SIGNING a cheque and thereby 'promising to pay'. I repeat, that's the only way 'money is ever made'.
They were the ones who jammed their oar into that simple mechanism.
And now for something that gets really silly
Mortgages. The method for obtaining the cash amount is the same as described above. But there is more to mortgages that meet the eye. (More, over and above, straight loans).
Here a property, in the form of a dwelling, is being transferred from one owner to another (actually one keeper to another, not owner, but that's another subject).
Now, it is illegal to mortgage a property you don't own. The property is considered to be the security on the loan. How can you be providing 'security' when you don't - at that time - actually own the thing?
And, secondly, it is illegal to transfer a property/dwelling that has not yet been paid for.
So ... what does this mean? You can't establish a loan, because you don't have any security to offer. Therefore you can't pay for it, because you can't get the loan money. (Err ... no. You can't offer you current home as security, because you are probably in the process of selling it!) And, since you can't pay for it, the Seller can't transfer it into your name.
But ... on the other hand ... people can and do establish mortgages, do buy homes, and do move house.
How is this done?
Well ... it happens by 'magic'. The Bank/Building Society uses 'magic'.
Not really paranormal 'magic', of course ... more akin to fraud, in actual fact.
John Dempsey, of Sovereign Trust, explains in absolute detail how the Magic Bank operates.
(Sovereign Trust, btw, don't employ any form of magic/fraud. They do it honestly, openly, candidly, and all above board)
Veronica: of the Chapman family
(January, 2009)
O JUS ZINOTE ,KAD MES ESAME VISI VERGAI IR NESVARBU KUR TU GYVENI.VALDZIA JUS ISNAUDOJA KAIP NORI IR IRODINEJA PER TA DEZE KURE NAMUOSE TURIT, KAS YRA BLOGAI IR KAIP JUMS ELGTIS.ZINOMA MES NETURIME PASIRINKIMO ELGTIS KITAIP NEI TA DEZE MUMS SAKO!!!O JUS AR ZINOTE!!! ,KAD UK VALDZIA TURI JUSU KIEVIENA ZINGSNI?JUMS SKOLINA PINIGUS VALDZIA ZINODAMA NET TAI KAD DAUGUMAS IS JUSU NEGALES ATIDUOTI IR JIEMS TAI TIKA!!!!! NES SKOLINA JUMS PINIGUS IS ORO PADARYTUS.NA AS NEAISKYSIU KAIP!! BET JAI JUMS IDOMU TAI !!!!!!!!!!!!KLAUSKYT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BET JUS NEKLAUSIT NES JUMS IDOMU KA PASODINO!!!!!!!!!!!!
SKAITYK ANGLISKAI GYVENDAMAS UK PRADZIAI :)
Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding that the United Kingdom is a common low jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that equality before the low is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislated rule of a society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the only form of government recognised as lawful in the United Kingdom is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution and/or Bill of Rights, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that said scope and applicability is limited to members and employees of government ,and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one`s NI number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that those who an NI numbers (National Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the UK government and thus are bounds by the statutes created by the UK government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restrains, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, JOANAS am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas I am not a child, and,
Whereas I am peaceful human being, and,
Whereas I am a Freemen-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility ,I do not see the need to ask permissions to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from toes who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a by-law is defined as a rule or a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that corporation are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and
Whereas it is my understanding that legal fiction lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my National Insurance Number, and
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and creates no obligation or dishonour if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statute and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peas officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freemen-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time.
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, JOANAS a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intend to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.
vien skaitant pikta darosi rasineja isgamos gerai saunuoliai ir t.t. bliamba ariat stroikese kad smyrdinti kambari nuomuotis kad savaitgaliais pagert nu ir i lietuva gryzus pagert draugus kaime pagyrdit o vaikstot sudini gerai kad pasodino tik gaila mazai dave isgamoms
Jo,gerai pasakyta: vagis uz vagi ,kaip akis uz aki:DD Cia tie pritariantys,matyt dar laisvej tebevaiksto:D
The group of six men from the Barking and Ilford areas of Essex were convicted at Chelmsford Crown Court last month for charges of conspiracy to handle stolen motor vehicles.
Joanas Bondarenko, Kamil Dudko, Krzystof Nowicki, Eduadas Masiulis, Nerijus Jarusivicius, and Vidmantas Lajauskas, handled the proceeds of burglaries under Operation Millennium including many addresses in Essex.
High value cars from hire companies at Stansted airport as well as private homes in west Essex.
False identities were used to hire the cars, including a Mercedes Benz and an Audi A4 among other cars worth between £12,000 and £32,000, and the vehicles were never returned at the end of the hire agreement.
The vehicles were instead carefully cloned using the identities of similar cars and all visible vehicle identification numbers would be changed.
Prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service, Anil Patani said: These men would specifically target high value vehicles and in quick time would change their identity and sell them on. Using this method they have been able to obtain what looks like valid paperwork for the vehicles so they can advertise them without being noticed. They have intentionally and repeatedly manipulated innocent members of the public for their own financial gain.
We are pleased that this case has been brought to a successful conclusion and that these men will no longer be able to carry out their criminal activity on the streets of Essex.
We hope that all those targeted by this gang can put this behind them and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for coming forward and assisting the prosecution.
The monies from the various sales were paid in to bank accounts under a false name.
Before the sale the men applied for vehicle registration documents and all valid paperwork from the DVLA using a bogus name and address which was later discovered to be a room rented for a short period of time.
They would then sell the vehicles through websites such as Auto Trader or ebay as well as through large car auctions.
The investigation, codenamed Operation Nidus, was led by Detective Constable Jean Seager from Stansted Airport, who said, This was organised crime on a large scale but the men made the mistake of linking their crime to the airport where our sophisticated security systems proved to be their undoing. The high level of security around UK airports meant that we had access to information and databases and were able to identify vehicles and bank accounts that led us to arrest all six men.
vistiek poto bankas grazino, tai ko dabar pergyveni, maladec vyrai savo pasirinko, ir padare. Pagarba
kaip grazu kad vagys tik uz vagis...tas kas nenukencia sneka kokie jie saunuoliai-bande prasisukti...tas ir papigiai vogta kompa perka is savo tautiecio pavogta,tas ir naudojasi klonuotom kortelem,grazu-bet kol neatsiduria to kuriam tai padare vietoje...o tada-nudesiu jei suzinosiu kas...
man nuklonavo kortele kazkur kolonelej,sakaita patvarkyta-tai grizau i uk su sauja euro centu ir bet kada galinciu pasibaigti benzinu bake...jausmas tikrai nekoks...
Cia tie komentarai isvis debilizmas yra , atsisede vaikai prirasineja ir viskas , o siaip gerai vyrukai sukosi tik gaila kad pagavo
ko jus cia knisat prota jiems.knisa prota tie kurie nieko nesugeba.norit visko ko geriausio bnet nemokat uztureti.taip kad jai nesugebat nieko kaip tik apsneketi kitus.kai turesi sunu ir pasodins uz ka nors kaip tyada snekesi zioplas sutverime.prasysi teisejo kad ilgesniam laikui pasodinti???????????? pagalvokit ka rasot
ko cia taskotes purvais jie preisidirbo tegu ir seda ,man jie asmeniskai neidomus aisku musu tautieciai gieda DARO
kaip kas nori, tas taip gyvena, ne jum uz juos sedet, ko cia tiek pergyvenanciu. ne ka geresni, kas sako, kad lietuviu geda but, tautos isdavikai, ypac moteriska gimine- pramoksta kalba ir jau anglem apsimeta, su tautieciais nebendrauja, cia tai slykstynes, nors pati esu moteris, man labiau uz jas geda, negu uz tuos vyrus, kariasi kales visokiem uzsienieciam ant sprando, parsidavineja-cia tai jau puosia musu Lietuva, o paskum dar komentara paraso, kaip joms geda, kad lietuves.....tik kitus visa laika matom, gal pirma i save pasiziurekim. nepavydziu niekam, kiek turiu, tiek uztenka, manau kad vaikinai kalejime ilgai nebus, o veliau tures is ko gyventi, o ir sazine ju rami, nieko nenuzude, niekam neparsidave...
JAI PRIES NIEKA NEBUVO SMURTO PANAUDOTA TAI PUIKEI PADIRBEJO VYRKAI ( DRAUDIMAS APMOKES )
per visus nusikaltimus kiek padaroma, nemanu kad labai jau didelis procentas lietuviu.
del tokiu issigimeliu geda lietuviu buti, kas mes per tauta jei lietuviai emigrantai padaro didziaja dali sunkui nusikaltimu, baisu laikrasti atsiversti...tokius ne sodinti reikia o naikinti...jau per daug treninguotu besmegeniu gatvemis vaiksto....
gerai kad isejo prasukt sitiek pinigu gaila kad taip baigesi.
Ir svarbiausia kad paprastas zmogelis nenukentejo.
geriau gailetis to ka padarei, negu to ko nepadarei.
kas kaip moka tas taip gyvena, nei vienam is cia parasiusiu masinos nepavoge, o is ko pavoge tai tokiom kainom masinos geru draudimu ir apdraustos, taip kad zmogui problemu del to nelabai daug ir yra.
Labai jau geri policijos pareigunai surado nusikaltelius kaip man buvo nutike kad masina nusipirkau ir po triju dienu buvo paskelpta kad pavogta masina atidave savininkuj o as buvau nenukentejus jiem net neidomu buvo pasakyta aiskinkis su savininku, nes mes tau nieko negalim padet bet savininkuj paskambinus daviau sesias valandas jei ne kviesiu as pati jy i teisma ir bilinesimies ir pasibaige tuo kad masina parsivariau pati ir aiskinausi viska pati va tau ir policija.
is lietuvos pilna dar nesugautu.daro viska priesingai,gyvena nesaziningai ir saipos is normaliu zmoniu
Del tokiu isgamu-geda prisipazinti kad esi is Lietuvos, Mazai dar gavo.
BUKIT PROTINGI IR GYVENKIT SAZINIGAI
:)
o tie lopai kurie isivaizduoja stroikje tik kad su sepeciu bruzina-tai tikrai gyvenime ir tetinkami stroike sluoti...gali prisvogti,prisidaryti makliu-bet prikabina,daugiau ar maziau po kurio laiko...gali paplesti -gerai,bet paskui dauguma teks advokatams atiduoti-kad kai kas atsikabintu...ir ka-vel ant nulio??? geriau maziau-bet ramiai...
Zinoma"gaas" :)
Na cia mini tik apie vagystes seme straipsni.Nors nei vienas is nuteistu ar pabegusiu tiesiogei nevoge. Pagrindas pardavimas. O tie kur pirko masinas kainuojancias realei po 30k uz 17-18k tai patys kalti. Negali masina but 10k pigiau nei kainuoja net jai ir sonas budavo nubraukiamas.
kiekvienas save gerbiantis leiboriukas is pirmu pinigeliu nusipirks audi a6,is sekanciu gal grandinele arba gera radija...kad prie bektono asdos galetu klausyti sustria rusiska muzika..
gerbti galima kad jie pasiekia apie ka jie svajoja ilgai,bet ar tai riba????
nors vienas matau supranta jb
Zinoma jus visi Lietuvei turite nusipirke uz paskutinius pinigus grazu automobili. Tai neuzmirskite nusipirkti ir draudima be melagyngu parodymu ,kad butu pigiau. Ir jai jums nelaime atsitiks ,tai jus visalaika susigrazinsit savo pinigus ir kol bus jusu dingus masina ieskoma jus gaunate nuomos nauja masina vazinetis.Tai jai jums pavoge ta jusu prabangu automobi tai jus gal ir busite patenkinti ,kad pavoge.
tam ir reike draustis masina, pilnu draudimu kat nesijaudintum del toku vagisiu. o ne nusipirkus gera masina us paskutinius pinigus vazineti be draudimo arba su lievu
Ka reiskia is paprastu zmoniu nevoge? Kas jie- tadai blindos? Cia UK nusipirkt nebloga masina nereikia buti turtuoliui. Daug mano pazistamu turi geras masinas, taciau nei turtuoliai, nei ka. Pats faktas, kad kazkas is tave paima tavo daikta, prievarta, yra slykstus. Ar yra kada nors jus apvoge? jausmas- sunku ir apsakyt - patikek
Tu man geras" gaas " prajuokinai..
is paprastu zmonu jie tikrai masinu nevoge tai nesijauding tavo bulkos tikrai nieks nevoks
as su oyster kortele vazineju o tos tikrai man is ranku neatims.
Jus galit gincitis kas teisus ir kas kaip turi gyventi iki begalybes. Cia yra pasirinkimas! ir zinoma ne pats geriauses.Zinau ,kad nei vienas ubagas nebuvo nuskriaustas..
Ale koks tas gaas kietas, tikras erelis. O tie berniukai - tai musu tautos ziedas. Tikrai turim ka parodyt pasauliui ir didziuotis. O tu ,gaas, ka veiki? Ar tik pavydi tiems kietiems berniukams, nes tavo kinkos per skystos ar tu is tu dar nepagautu? O tu pats turbut labai dziaugtumeis nuvaryta savo masina, plotum per peti ir sakytum: "Saunuoliai, gerai pasidarbavot".
Krzystofas Nowickis Yra lenkas kaip ir Duko :)
maladec pacanai pakele lapu o pasedeja ir dar ka nors kudriau sugalvos .o jus kaimieciai
buvot statybininkais ir mirsit su sepeciais
Krzystofas Nowickis ,grynas lietuvis,turbut rusakalbis.
Dar dadesiu jusu zinei ,kad nera taip kaip raso.
Oi kaip graziai MAKENASpragydo.Zinai geriau stroikės dulkes uostyt,nei tryntis kaleime bilekiek metu ir saugiti savo šikna kad niekas neidurtu i šokolado ceha.Nors kaip kam kas patinka.....
Komedija!!! man patika skaityti jusu diskusijas..
saunuoliai o ka jus visi l dirbat stroikej ir uostot dulkes,daugiau nieko nesugebat nes bijot buvot ubagais ir busit
jei nori zinot tai bondarenko ir dudko ne rusiskos pavardes,o ukrainietiskos. :DDD
staliukai-ne miegantys...gauna gerus pinigus...840-virs stukos per savaite...sunkus darbas,bet zinai kad tai tavo...tokie nevykeliai-lopai,tik stengiasi surast kazka lengviau.ir daugiausia rusiska pavarde...
Aciu uz jusu komentarus. Norejau dadeti tik ,kad nei 1 ubagas nebuvo nuskriaustas, kai dauguma kitu lietuviu daro.
bet kaip galima nevertint kito zmogaus? juk uzsidirba kiekvienas ir pagal galimybes kurias savo gyvenima.truksta pinigu-eik kur naktim padirbet ar pan.tai sumasto voginet...............kazin ar patiktu,jei is ju automobilius atimtu.bausmes per svelnios,deja
Nu totalus idiojotai galvoja kad policijoj kvailiai sedi cia jum ne lietuva
dar dirbo darbe ir voge? kaip tokiu galima pasitiket? gali pavogt ir irankius ir isvis be sazines jiem tas pats.
esu dirbes pas ta joana dailide , skrudzas svolocius
kokie slykstus sitie zmones.bausmes per mazos.nu kaip sitaip gyvent? nukapot nagus uz vagyste